《2022"A Time for Choosing&quot_quot.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022"A Time for Choosing&quot_quot.docx（26页珍藏版）》请在得力文库 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。
1、2022"A Time for Choosing"_quot "A Time for Choosing"由我整理，希望给你工作、学习、生活带来便利，猜你可能喜爱“quot”。 ronald reagan: a time for choosing (aka the speech) program announcer: ladies and gentlemen, we take pride in presenting a thoughtful addre by ronald reagan.mr.reagan: reagan: th
2、ank you.thank you very much.thank you and good evening.the sponsor has been identified, but unlike most television programs, the performer hasnt been provided with a script.as a matter of fact, i have been permitted to choose my own words and discu my own ideas regarding the choice that we face in t
3、he next few weeks. i have spent most of my life as a democrat.i recently have seen fit to follow another course.i believe that the iues confronting us cro party lines.now, one side in this campaign has been telling us that the iues of this election are the maintenance of peace and prosperity.the lin
4、e has been used, weve never had it so good. as for the peace that we would preserve, i wonder who among us would like to approach the wife or mother whose husband or son has died in south vietnam and ask them if they think this is a peace that should be maintained indefinitely.do they mean peace, or
5、 do they mean we just want to be left in peace? there can be no real peace while one american is dying some place in the world for the rest of us.were at war with the most dangerous enemy that has ever faced mankind in his long climb from the swamp to the stars, and its been said if we lose that war
6、, and in so doing lose this way of freedom of ours, history will record with the greatest astonishment that those who had the most to lose did the least to prevent its happening.well i think its time we ask ourselves if we still know the freedoms that were intended for us by the founding fathers. no
7、t too long ago, two friends of mine were talking to a cuban refugee, a busineman who had escaped from castro, and in the midst of his story one of my friends turned to the other and said, we dont know how lucky we are. and the cuban stopped and said, how lucky you are? i had someplace to escape to.
8、and in that sentence he told us the entire story.if we lose freedom here, theres no place to escape to.this is the last stand on earth. and this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except the sovereign people, is still the newest and the most unique i
9、dea in all the long history of mans relation to man. this is the iue of this election: whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the american revolution and confe that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can
10、 plan them ourselves. you and i are told increasingly we have to choose between a left or right.well id like to suggest there is no such thing as a left or right.theres only an up or down - up mans old - old-aged dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order, or down to the
11、 ant heap of totalitarianism.and regardle of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course. in this vote-harvesting time, they use terms like the great society, or as we were told a few days ago by the president, we
12、must accept a greater government activity in the affairs of the people.but theyve been a little more explicit in the past and among themselves; and all of the things i now will quote have appeared in print.these are not republican accusations.for example, they have voices that say, the cold war will
13、 end through our acceptance of a not undemocratic socialism. another voice says, the profit motive has become outmoded.it must be replaced by the incentives of the welfare state. or, our traditional system of individual freedom is incapable of solving the complex problems of the 20th century. senato
14、r fullbright has said at stanford university that the constitution is outmoded.he referred to the president as our moral teacher and our leader, and he says he is hobbled in his task by the restrictions of power imposed on him by this antiquated document. he must be freed, so that he can do for us w
15、hat he knows is best. and senator clark of pennsylvania, another articulate spokesman, defines liberalism as meeting the material needs of the maes through the full power of centralized government. well, i, for one, resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me, the free men and
16、 women of this country, as the maes. this is a term we havent applied to ourselves in america.but beyond that, the full power of centralized government - this was the very thing the founding fathers sought to minimize.they knew that governments dont control things.a government cant control the econo
17、my without controlling people.and they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose.they also knew, those founding fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the e
18、conomy. senator humphrey last week charged that barry goldwater, as president, would seek to eliminate farmers.he should do his homework a little better, because hell find out that weve had a decline of 5 million in the farm population under these government programs.hell also find that the democrat
19、ic administration has sought to get from congre an extension of the farm program to include that three-fourths that is now free.hell find that theyve also asked for the right to imprison farmers who wouldnt keep books as prescribed by the federal government.the secretary of agriculture asked for the
20、 right to seize farms through condemnation and resell them to other individuals.and contained in that same program was a provision that would have allowed the federal government to remove 2 million farmers from the soil. at the same time, theres been an increase in the department of agriculture empl
21、oyees.theres now one for every 30 farms in the united states, and still they cant tell us how 66 shiploads of grain headed for austria disappeared without a trace and billie sol estes never left shore. every responsible farmer and farm organization has repeatedly asked the government to free the far
22、m economy, but how - who are farmers to know whats best for them? the wheat farmers voted against a wheat program.the government paed it anyway.now the price of bread goes up; the price of wheat to the farmer goes down. meanwhile, back in the city, under urban renewal the aault on freedom carries on
23、.private property rights are so diluted that public interest is almost anything a few government planners decide it should be.in a program that takes from the needy and gives to the greedy, we see such spectacles as in cleveland, ohio, a million-and-a-half-dollar building completed only three years
24、ago must be destroyed to make way for what government officials call a more compatible use of the land. the president tells us hes now going to start building public housing units in the thousands, where heretofore weve only built them in the hundreds.but fha federal housing authority and the vetera
25、ns administration tell us they have 120,000 housing units theyve taken back through mortgage foreclosure.for three decades, weve sought to solve the problems of unemployment through government planning, and the more the plans fail, the more the planners plan.the latest is the area redevelopment agen
26、cy. theyve just declared rice county, kansas, a depreed area.rice county, kansas, has two hundred oil wells, and the 14,000 people there have over 30 million dollars on deposit in personal savings in their banks.and when the government tells you youre depreed, lie down and be depreed. we have so man
27、y people who cant see a fat man standing beside a thin one without coming to the conclusion the fat man got that way by taking advantage of the thin one.so theyre going to solve all the problems of human misery through government and government planning.well, now, if government planning and welfare
28、had the answer - and theyve had almost 30 years of it - shouldnt we expect government to read the score to us once in a while? shouldnt they be telling us about the decline each year in the number of people needing help? the reduction in the need for public housing? but the reverse is true.each year
29、 the need grows greater; the program grows greater.we were told four years ago that 17 million people went to bed hungry each night.well that was probably true.they were all on a diet.but now were told that 9.3 million families in this country are poverty-stricken on the basis of earning le than 3,0
30、00 dollars a year.welfare spending is 10 times greater than in the dark depths of the depreion.were spending 45 billion dollars on welfare.now do a little arithmetic, and youll find that if we divided the 45 billion dollars up equally among those 9 million poor families, wed be able to give each fam
31、ily 4,600 dollars a year.and this added to their present income should eliminate poverty.direct aid to the poor, however, is only running only about 600 dollars per family.it would seem that someplace there must be some overhead. 范文网【】 but seriously, what are we doing to those we seek to help? not t
32、oo long ago, a judge called me here in los angeles.he told me of a young woman whod come before him for a divorce.she had six children, was pregnant with her seventh.under his questioning, she revealed her husband was a laborer earning 250 dollars a month.she wanted a divorce to get an 80 dollar rai
33、se.shes eligible for 330 dollars a month in the aid to dependent children program.she got the idea from two women in her neighborhood whod already done that very thing. yet anytime you and i question the schemes of the do-gooders, were denounced as being against their humanitarian goals.they say wer
34、e always against things - were never for anything. well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that theyre ignorant; its just that they know so much that isnt so. now - were for a provision that destitution should not follow unemployment by reason of old age, and to that end weve accepted soci
35、al security as a step toward meeting the problem. but were against those entrusted with this program when they practice deception regarding its fiscal shortcomings, when they charge that any criticism of the program means that we want to end payments to those people who depend on them for a liveliho
36、od.theyve called it insurance to us in a hundred million pieces of literature.but then they appeared before the supreme court and they testified it was a welfare program.they only use the term insurance to sell it to the people.and they said social security dues are a tax for the general use of the
37、government, and the government has used that tax.there is no fund, because robert byers, the actuarial head, appeared before a congreional committee and admitted that social security as of this moment is 298 billion dollars in the hole.but he said there should be no cause for worry because as long a
38、s they have the power to tax, they could always take away from the people whatever they needed to bail them out of trouble.and theyre doing just that. barry goldwater thinks we can. at the same time, cant we introduce voluntary features that would permit a citizen who can do better on his own to be
39、excused upon presentation of evidence that he had made provision for the non-earning years? should we not allow a widow with children to work, and not lose the benefits supposedly paid for by her deceased husband? shouldnt you and i be allowed to declare who our beneficiaries will be under this prog
40、ram, which we cannot do? i think were for telling our senior citizens that no one in this country should be denied medical care because of a lack of funds.but i think were against forcing all citizens, regardle of need, into a compulsory government program, especially when we have such examples, as
41、was announced last week, when france admitted that their medicare program is now bankrupt.theyve come to the end of the road. in addition, was barry goldwater so irresponsible when he suggested that our government give up its program of deliberate, planned inflation, so that when you do get your soc
42、ial security pension, a dollar will buy a dollars worth, and not 45 cents worth? i think were for an international organization, where the nations of the world can seek peace.but i think were against subordinating american interests to an organization that has become so structurally unsound that tod
43、ay you can muster a two-thirds vote on the floor of the general aembly among nations that represent le than 10 percent of the worlds population.i think were against the hypocrisy of aailing our allies because here and there they cling to a colony, while we engage in a conspiracy of silence and never
44、 open our mouths about the millions of people enslaved in the soviet colonies in the satellite nations. no government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size.so.governments programs, once launched, never disappear. actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life well ever see on t
45、his earth. federal employees - federal employees number two and a half million; and federal, state, and local, one out of six of the nations work force employed by government.these proliferating bureaus with their thousands of regulations have cost us many of our constitutional safeguards.how many o
46、f us realize that today federal agents can invade a mans property without a warrant? they can impose a fine without a formal hearing, let alone a trial by jury? and they can seize and sell his property at auction to enforce the payment of that fine.in chico county, arkansas, james wier over-planted
47、his rice allotment.the government obtained a 17,000 dollar judgment.and a u.s.marshal sold his 960-acre farm at auction.the government said it was neceary as a warning to others to make the system work. last february 19th at the university of minnesota, norman thomas, six-times candidate for preside
48、nt on the socialist party ticket, said, if barry goldwater became president, he would stop the advance of socialism in the united states. i think thats exactly what he will do. but as a former democrat, i can tell you norman thomas isnt the only man who has drawn this parallel to socialism with the present administration, because back in 1936, mr.democrat himself, al smith, the great american, came before the american p
黑公网安备:91230400333293403D