2001年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题.docx

《2001年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2001年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题.docx（14页珍藏版）》请在得力文库 - 分享文档赚钱的网站上搜索。

1、2001 年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题Section IUse ofEnglishDirections:For each numbered blank in the following passage, there are four choices marked A, B, C, and D. Choose the best one and mark your answer on ANSWER SHEET 1 by blackening the corresponding letter in the brackets with a pencil. (10 points)The gove

2、rnment is to ban payments to witnesses by newspapers seeking to buy up people involved in prominent cases 1 the trial of Rosemary West.In a significant 2 of legal controls over the press, Lord Irvine, the Lord Chancellor, will introduce a 3 bill that will propose making payments to witnesses 4 and w

3、ill strictly control the amount of 5 that can be given to a case 6 a trial begins.In a letter to Gerald Kaufman, chairman of the House of Commons media select committee, Lord Irvine said he 7 with a committee report this year which said that self regulation did not 8 sufficient control. 9 of the let

4、ter came two days after Lord Irvine caused a 10 of media protest when he said the 11 of privacy controls contained in European legislation would be left to judges 12 to Parliament.The Lord Chancellor said introduction of the Human Rights Bill, which 13 the European Convention on Human Rights legally

5、 14 in Britain, laid down that everybody was 15 to privacy and that public figures could go to court to protect themselves and their families.“Press freedoms will be in safe hands 16 our British judges,” he said.Witness payments became an 17 after West was sentenced to 10 life sentences in 1995. Up

6、to 19 witnesses were 18 to have received payments for telling their stories to newspapers. Concerns were raised 19 witnesses might be encouraged exaggerate their stories in court to 20 guilty verdicts.- 14 -1.Aas toBfor instanceCin particularDsuch as2.AtighteningBintensifyingCfocusingDfastening3.Ask

7、etchBroughCpreliminaryDdraft4.AillogicalBillegalCimprobableDimproper5.ApublicityBpenaltyCpopularityDpeculiarity6.AsinceBifCbeforeDas7.AsidedBsharedCcompliedDagreed8.ApresentBofferCmanifestDindicate9.AReleaseBPublicationCPrintingDExposure10.AstormBrageCflareDflash11.AtranslationBinterpretationCexhibi

8、tionDdemonstration12.Abetter thanBother thanCrather thanDsooner than13.AchangesBmakesCsetsDturns14.AbindingBconvincingCrestrainingDsustaining15.AauthorizedBcreditedCentitledDqualified16.AwithBtoCfromDby17.AimpactBincidentCinferenceDissue18.AstatedBremarkedCsaidDtold19.AwhatBwhenCwhichDthat20.Aassure

9、BconfideCensureDguaranteeSection Reading ComprehensionPart A Directions:Each of the passages below is followed by some questions. For each question there are four answers marked A, B, C and D. Read the passages carefully and choose the best answer to each of the questions. Then mark your answer on t

10、he ANSWER SHEET 1 by blackening the corresponding letter in the brackets. (40 points)Text 1Specialisation can be seen as a response to the problem of an increasing accumulation of scientific knowledge. By splitting up the subject matter into smaller units，one man could continue to handle the informa

11、tion and use it as the basis for further research. But specialisation was only one of a series of related developments in science affecting the process of communication. Another was the growing professionalisation of scientific activity.No clear-cut distinction can be drawn between professionals and

12、 amateurs in science: exceptions can be found to any rule. Nevertheless, the word “amateur” does carry a connotation that the person concerned is not fully integrated into the scientific community and, in particular, may not fully share its values. The growth of specialisation in the nineteenth cent

13、ury, with its consequent requirement of a longer, more complex training, implied greater problems for amateur participation in science. The trend was naturally most obvious in those areas of science based especially on a mathematical or laboratory training, and can be illustrated in terms of the dev

14、elopment of geology in the United Kingdom.A comparison of British geological publications over the last century and a half reveals not simply an increasing emphasis on the primacy of research, but also a changing definition of what constitutes an acceptable research paper. Thus, in the nineteenth ce

15、ntury, local geological studies represented worthwhile research in their own right; but, in the twentieth century, local studies have increasingly become acceptable to professionals only if they incorporate, and reflect on, the wider geological picture. Amateurs, on the other hand, have continued to

16、 pursue local studies in the old way. The overall result has been to make entrance to professional geological journals harder for amateurs, a result that has been reinforced by the widespread introduction of refereeing, first by national journals in the nineteenth century and then by several local g

17、eological journals in the twentieth century. As a logical consequence of this development, separate journals have now appeared aimed mainly towards either professional or amateur readership. A rather similar process of differentiation has led to professional geologists coming together nationally wit

18、hin one or two specific societies, whereas the amateurs have tended either to remain in local societies or to come together nationally in a different way.Although the process of professionalisation and specialisation was already well under way in British geology during the nineteenth century, its fu

19、ll consequences were thus delayed until the twentieth century. In science generally, however, the nineteenth century must be reckoned as the crucial period for this change in the structure of science.21. The growth of specialisation in the 19th century might be more clearly seen in sciences such as

20、.AJ sociology and chemistryB physics and psychologyC sociology and psychologyD physics and chemistry22. We can infer from the passage that .A there is little distinction between specialisation and professionalisationB amateurs can compete with professionals in some areas of scienceC professionals te

21、nd to welcome amateurs into the scientific communityD amateurs have national academic societies but no local ones23. The author writes of the development of geology to demonstrate .A the process of specialisation and professionalisationB the hardship of amateurs in scientific studyC the change of po

22、licies in scientific publicationsD the discrimination of professionals against amateurs24. The direct reason for specialisation is .A the development in communicationB the growth of professionalisationC the expansion of scientific knowledgeD the splitting up of academic societiesText 2A great deal o

23、f attention is being paid today to the so-called digital divide-the division of the world into the info (information) rich and the info poor. And that divide does exist today. My wife and I lectured about this looming danger twenty years ago. What was less visible then, however, were the new, positi

24、ve forces that work against the digital divide. There are reasons to be optimistic.There are technological reasons to hope the digital divide will narrow. As the Internet becomes more and more commercialized, it is in the interest of business to universalize access-after all, the more people online,

25、 the more potential customers there are. More and more governments, afraid their countries will be left behind, want to spread Internet access. Within the next decade or two, one to two billion people on the planet will he netted together. As a result, I now believe the digital divide will narrow ra

26、ther than widen in the years ahead. And that is very good news because the Internet may well be the most powerful tool for combating world poverty that weve ever had.Of course, the use of the Internet isnt the only way to defeat poverty. And the Internet is not the only tool we have. But it has enor

27、mous potential.To take advantage of this tool, some impoverished countries will have to get over their outdated anti-colonial prejudices with respect to foreign investment. Countries that still think foreign investment is an invasion of their sovereignty might well study the history of infrastructur

28、e（the basic structuralfoundations of a society）in the United States. When the United States built its industrial infrastructure,it didnt have the capital to do so. And that is why Americas Second Wave infrastructure-including roads, harbors, highways, ports and so on-were built with foreign investme

29、nt. The English, the Germans, the Dutch and the French were investing in Britains former colony. They financed them. Immigrant Americans built them. Guess who owns them now? The Americans. I believe the same thing would be true in places like Brazil or anywhere else for that matter. The more foreign

30、 capital you have helping you build your Third Wave infrastructure, which today is an electronic infrastructure, the better off youre going to be. That doesnt mean lying down and becoming fooled, or letting foreign corporations run uncontrolled. But it does mean recognizing how important they can be

31、 in building the energy and telecom infrastructures needed to take full advantage of the Internet.25. Digital divide is something .A getting worse because of the InternetB the rich countries are responsible forC the world must guard againstD considered positive today26. Governments attach importance

32、 to the Internet because it .A offers economic potentialsB can bring foreign fundsC can soon wipe out world povertyD connects people all over the world27. The writer mentioned the case of the United States to justify the policy of .A providing financial support overseasB preventing foreign capitals

33、controlC building industrial infrastructureD accepting foreign investment28. It seems that now a countrys economy depands much on .A how well-developed it is electronicallyB whether it is prejudiced against immigrantsC whether it adopts Americas industrial patternD how much control it has over forei

34、gn corporationsText 3Why do so many Americans distrust what they read in their newspapers? The American Society of Newspaper Editors is trying to answer this painful question. The organization is deep into a long self-analysis known as the journalism credibility project.Sad to say, this project has

35、turned out to be mostly low-level findings about factual errors and spelling and grammar mistakes, combined with lots of headscratching puzzlement about what in the world those readers really want.But the sources of distrust go way deeper. Most journalists learn to see the world through a set of sta

36、ndard templates (patterns) into which they plug each days events. In other words, there is a conventional story line in the newsroom culture that provides a backbone and a ready-made narrative structure for otherwise confusions news.There exists a social and cultural disconnect between journalists a

37、nd their readers which helps explain why the “ standard templates” of the newsroom seem alien many readers. In a recent survey, questionnaires were sent to reporters in five middle size cities around the country, plus one large metropolitan area. Then residents in these communities were phoned at ra

38、ndom and asked the same questions.Replies show that compared with other Americans, journalists are more likely to live in upscale neighborhoods, have maids, own Mercedeses, and trade stocks, and theyre less likely to go to church, do volunteer work, or put down roots in community.Reporters tend to b

39、e part of a broadly defined social and cultural elite, so their work tends to reflect the conventional values of this elite. The astonishing distrust of the news media isnt rooted in inaccuracy or poor reportorial skills but in the daily clash of world views between reporters and their readers.This

40、is an explosive situation for any industry, particularly a declining one. Here is a troubled business that keeps hiring employees whose attitudes vastly annoy the customers. Then it sponsors lots of symposiums and a credibility project dedicated to wondering why customers are annoyed and fleeing in

41、large numbers. But it never seems to get around to noticing the cultural and class biases that so many former buyers are complaining about. If it did, it would open up its diversity program, now focused narrowly on race and gender, and look for reporters who differ broadly by outlook, values, educat

42、ion, and class.29. What is the passage mainly about?A needs of the readers all over the world.B causes of the public disappointment about newspapers.C origins of the declining newspaper industry.D aims of a journalism credibility project.30. The results of the journalism credibility project turned o

43、ut to be.A quite trustworthyB somewhat contradictoryC very illuminatingD rather superficial31. The basic problem of journalists as pointed out by the writer lies in their.A working attitudeB conventional lifestyleC world outlookD educational background32. Despite its efforts, the newspaper industry

44、still cannot satisfy the readers owing to its .A failure to realize its real problemB tendency to hire annoying reportersC likeliness to do inaccurate reportingD prejudice in matters of race and genderText 4The world is going through the biggest wave of mergers and acquisitions ever witnessed. The p

45、rocess sweeps from hyperactive America to Europe and reaches the emerging countries with unsurpassed might. Many in these countries are looking at this process and worrying: Wont the wave of business concentration turn into an uncontrollable anti-competitive force?Theres no question that the big are

46、 getting bigger and more powerful. Multinational corporations accounted for less than 20% of international trade in 1982. Today the figure is more than 25% and growing rapidly. International affiliates account for a fast-growing segment of production in economies that open up and welcome foreign inv

47、estment. In Argentina, for instance, after the reforms of the early 1990s, multinationals went from 43% to almost 70% of the industrial production of the 200 largest firms. This phenomenon has created serious concerns over the role of smaller economic firms, of national businessmen and over the ultimate stability of the world economy.I believe that the most imp